is one of the mantras, along with "never have anything of yours" or "you can always sell and make a profit" in which has underpinned housing bubble, and we've all heard on occasion, especially those we are inclined by tenancy, thereby opposing parents, grandparents, coworkers, friends, intergalactic forces and powers that number, which called for (and many of them still refuse to stop advocating) the Loft furnished as "investment."
I'm not going to dwell on the data input rental rates in welfare states like Germany or Sweden, since this argument has always been there and has repeatedly dismissed since, as we all know (and if someone puts it in Certainly not in the photo), "as in Spain do not live anywhere." There is only gay fellows see the smiles with which so many "northern European" crab wearing their skins and socks to his knees in the promenades de Mallorca Lloret de Mar. By the way, which will Turkey, Croatia and Bulgaria are about starving. And do not come in the picture.
Nor will I make a passionate defense against the rental property and, generically, because in any case, it is a decision to be taken in response to cyclical conditions. Juncture that, in Spain from about 2000 to date, meant and means to buy will not be the rational choice, even though the legislation (Law heir Boyer quasi-criminalization of the tenant), the media blitz on all fronts, easy credit with negative real interest rates (lower than inflation) and the very mentality entrenched in society Tardofranquismo invited to think otherwise. Yes, I recognize that sucks buy Björklund, an S ø lengard a Kiräväs, or any other of those fashionable sofas that then what is the bitch of the home.
However, in that situation, I will defend rent as an investment, even if they reach the cost of a mortgage for the same property (not applicable).
could be making two previous semantic considerations. The first relates to the concept of rent. And the rent is not exactly opposed to property, because the lease does not provide a physical good, but a service. The second, in relation to the concept of ownership. And is that the property is mortgaged floor of the bank until it meets total debt. Therefore, we might well refer to a mortgage as "rent money" that is exactly what it is.
So, how justify the investment in obtaining a service as a rental property against the cost of money with which to buy? I have it very clear: in intangibles. Specifically, flexibility, tranquility and debt.
Just look at how many of those who yesterday boasted winners are now in a delicate situation to realize that we live in a changing socio-economic reality. The fact that we are who Today we join the labor market does not look anything like that faced by our parents, and possibly also to our children to be found. Don Pablo no longer provides a "job for life" because that model is no longer competitive, and our competitiveness depends on the fragile state of being that we have. Competitiveness in these times, and like it or not, goes hand in hand with flexibility work, but also geographically. A mortgage at 30, 40 or 50 years (as witches, Habel Hayles ) is an irreversible commitment to long term, it ignores the evolution (or devolution) that may occur to our society. And of course, flexibility is also rising. What goes through a roll and want to make a quantum leap? You have thousands of houses hoping to be hired. Therefore, rent is to invest in flexibility.
Another intrinsic value, and it falls under its own weight, is investment in peace . When you rent, no noose, or at least allows you to breathe more freely. Run no danger hipotecándote not run, and instead, you save many. What now there are economic difficulties? Are looking for something cheaper. The peace means health, and why not, some cost savings in future treatment capillaries.
Finally, and I think this is the most important of all, I think that rent is to invest in leveraged . And some may wonder, how come that, when this guy is defending the absence of debt as a life philosophy? Well, you do not need much dressing: our monetary system is based on the debt. Money is debt . This means that the larger our debt, that is, our ability to borrow in the future, the more capacity we have to make money in the system. Therefore, we have greater intrinsic value in a system that tends to spoil us. But then do not get no debt, are potential debtors, and that is listed. Once the debt contracted and tied the string and ball to the ankle, a person may be worth the same as a landmark, only have obligations. And I do not know about you, but the latter is not a scenario that motivates me especially ...