The other day was established in Subjective Geography one of these parallels that we all come to mind when we hear news of Alakrana, and the kidnapping of Miguel Angel Blanco. He wondered about the attitude of the opposition of the PP, if the yardstick is different when the ruler is the PSOE and the PP itself, being more than obvious the answer.
I come to mind two questions, so disturbing (and uncertain) that I find your answers, accentuated by the attitude that the Government itself is taking to the kidnapping:
1 ª - " It is legitimate for the slogan to blackmail or threat of ETA is different to the reference to blackmail or threat by any other organization? Or put another way, is it desirable that the principles of justice or fairness are subordinated to a strategy of State to adjudicate to what or who may be transferred and to what or who is not?
2 ª - If no assignment to the blackmail of ETA in 1997, which resulted in the execution of Miguel Angel Blanco, the decision was accepted as desirable, and yet not remotely referred to a decision that could lead to such consequences in the case of Alakrana sailors, is not being recognized, implicitly, that "something would be done" Miguel Ángel Blanco? Is there not also fall into the mistake of confusing the qualitative to the quantitative?
And of course, my little heart wants to become sailors, regardless. Simply, I had a deja vu .
0 comments:
Post a Comment