had always perceived the irresponsible sinned Catalan nationalism. I guess it's normal to perceive that, when the blame for any problems that occur within its borders is that being called "Madrit" because, suspiciously, no liability is attributable to the managers of 90% of the life of the Catalans , a class recurring surnames policy is self-present as the friend of his managed and groups whose defense against external enemies. Or at least that was the image that was projected, and that I, like many others, perceived from a distance. And eye that no one says "Madrit" is free of guilt. In fact, I suspect that the "Madrit" current has taken note of this tactic and is giving a good account of it.
Later, when I lived there, I saw that this went far beyond irresponsible, not only affected the Catalan nationalism, but encompassed the full spectrum in that politically correct buzzword called Catalan . Of course, the opposite end no responsibility abounds, but in the end, make no mistake, the other end Catalonia is something like the goose chase. And yes, I consider it irresponsible to throw balls out in terms of accountability. But do not think it less irresponsible, although it is much more serious from an ethical point of view (and practical), encouraging the ghettoization of society that suits you manage. Or apply cultural apartheid that culture conceived in the language of half of society, eliminating the social and cultural life politically correct, reducing his image to droll aspects and topics and labeling of "foreign culture", thereby giving a more enlightened varnish and generate commitment to that which is intended to promote. Or use emotional blackmail permanently, precisely against the weakest link in the society, economic and cultural terms, to whom covertly blamed for all the miseries of this earth. Or so many other things that would fill paragraphs and that, basically, anyone who has lived there knows perfectly well, whether you've noticed it or not, whether you agree with it or not.
However, I have never seen such irresponsibility as I see it clear as recently referendums and other bagpipes. That circus aspects aside (because we must recognize the humor of some of the actors), analyze the results seems to me the most insignificant, because we know that everyone has won, so each is the wiggle to your liking. But hey, I respect deeply who sits independence, or whatever. I can be more or less agree with their claims of a referendum, and indeed, in general, I am not averse to the idea itself, though it may be critical to its procedures. And I can be more or less at odds with the wording of the question, but no longer seems strange that aversion to pose questions clearly, "Do you want independence?" and ball point, and that stubbornness in adhesorios decorate with items such as "social and European state, which does not cease to be acts of faith, and that is to see if they come true, come on, tell me ... but anyway, I detour. What I find disturbing is that obsession to present separation, social polarization, as something fun . The Basques know very well what is social polarization, but I doubt that anyone, a difficult angle that is in his trench, see this polarization with glee. I think we all see it as something traumatic. Moreover, I am convinced that something is traumatic. For that reason, when these nous Almogàvers trying to sell the separation as a party, I can not help but think of the irresponsibility they are incurring, and the foundations on which are supporting this new Casa Gran who say they building, I suspect that the epicenter of a failure ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment